Fiber Analysis Methods and Future Perspectives in Small Ruminant Farming

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64614/vzs-29

Keywords:

Keratin, small animal fibers, molecular analysis, mohair, wool

Abstract

Natural fibers obtained from sheep farming (wool, mohair, hair, and cashmere) constitute a significant resource for the textile-based production industry and biotechnological potential in Turkey and globally. Traditionally used as raw materials for the textile industry, these fibers now have a wide range of applications, from biomedical materials to nanocomposite production, from cosmetic formulations to functional foods, thanks to developing analysis technologies and interdisciplinary approaches. In this study, the analysis methods used on sheep fibers are classified under three main headings: physical, chemical, and molecular. Physical analyses cover the fundamental determinants of textile quality, such as fiber diameter, length, elasticity and strength, crimp structure, and luster. Chemical analyses reveal the amino acid composition, elemental content, thermal behavior, and molecular structure of keratin, the primary structure of fibers. Molecular analyses have gained significant importance in animal fiber research. While research in Turkey has primarily focused on physical and chemical analyses, genetic diversity analyses, breed-based quality maps, and molecular studies on follicle biology have increased in recent years. In the world literature, analysis methods are often addressed within an interdisciplinary framework, focusing on areas such as nanocomposite production, tissue engineering applications, bioplastic development, keratin-based wound dressings, hydrogels, and biodegradable composites. The use of hydrolyzed keratin peptides in functional foods and nutritional supplements is also a significant development. This review generally describes traditional and modern methods used in the analysis of small ruminant fibers and attempts to provide a roadmap for interdisciplinary research. Turkey's rich small ruminant resources hold great potential for innovative approaches to fiber analysis.

Author Biography

Arzu Özdemir, nternational Livestock Research and Education Center Directorate Mamak-ANKARA

Natural fibers obtained from sheep farming (wool, mohair, hair, and cashmere) constitute a significant resource for the textile-based production industry and biotechnological potential in Turkey and globally. Traditionally used as raw materials for the textile industry, these fibers now have a wide range of applications, from biomedical materials to nanocomposite production, from cosmetic formulations to functional foods, thanks to developing analysis technologies and interdisciplinary approaches. In this study, the analysis methods used on sheep fibers are classified under three main headings: physical, chemical, and molecular. Physical analyses cover the fundamental determinants of textile quality, such as fiber diameter, length, elasticity and strength, crimp structure, and luster. Chemical analyses reveal the amino acid composition, elemental content, thermal behavior, and molecular structure of keratin, the primary structure of fibers. Molecular analyses have gained significant importance in animal fiber research. While research in Turkey has primarily focused on physical and chemical analyses, genetic diversity analyses, breed-based quality maps, and molecular studies on follicle biology have increased in recent years. In the world literature, analysis methods are often addressed within an interdisciplinary framework, focusing on areas such as nanocomposite production, tissue engineering applications, bioplastic development, keratin-based wound dressings, hydrogels, and biodegradable composites. The use of hydrolyzed keratin peptides in functional foods and nutritional supplements is also a significant development. This review generally describes traditional and modern methods used in the analysis of small ruminant fibers and attempts to provide a roadmap for interdisciplinary research. Turkey's rich small ruminant resources hold great potential for innovative approaches to fiber analysis.

References

Aluigi, A., Sotgiu, G., Torreggiani, A., Guerrini, A., Orlandi, V.T., Corticelli, F., & Varchi, G. (2015). Methylene blue doped films of wool keratin with antimicrobial photodynamic activity. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 7(31), 17416-17424.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b04699

Arzik, Y., Kizilaslan, M., Behrem, S., White, S.N., Piel, L.M., & Cinar, M.U. (2023). Genome-wide scan of wool production traits in Akkaraman sheep. Genes, 14(3), 713.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14030713

Atav, R., & Öktem, T. (2006). Structural properties of Mohair (Angora goat) fibres. Textile and Apparel, 16(2), 105-109.

Atav, R., Ünal, G.P., & Soysal, M.I. (2022). Investigation of the quality characteristics of wool obtained from Karacabey Merino sheep grown in Thrace region-Turkey. Journal of Natural Fibers, 19(3), 1107-1114.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2020.1795777

Banasaz, S., & Ferraro, V. (2024). Keratin from animal by-products: structure, characterization, extraction and application-a review. Polymers, 16(14), 1999.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16141999

Baskan-Bayrak, H., & Karakas, H. (2024). Morphology and chemical structure of a wool fiber. In The Wool Handbook (pp. 181-194). Woodhead Publishing.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-99598-6.00020-7

Chen, X., Lan, Q., & Zhu, Y. (2024). Non-destructive identification of wool and cashmere fibers based on improved LDA using NIR spectroscopy. AUTEX Research Journal, 24(1), 20230017.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/aut-2023-0017

Daşkıran, İ., & Koluman, N. (2015). Ankara İli Tiftik (Ankara) keçisi işletmelerinin güncel analizi ve sürdürülebilir yetiştiriciliğe ilişkin yaklaşımlar. Çukurova Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(1), 25-38.

Dias, G.J., Haththotuwa, T.N., Rowlands, D.S., Gram, M., & Bekhit, A.E.D.A. (2022). Wool keratin–A novel dietary protein source: Nutritional value and toxicological assessment. Food Chemistry, 383, 132436.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132436

Feroz, S., Muhammad, N., Ratnayake, J., & Dias, G. (2020). Keratin-based materials for biomedical applications. Bioactive Materials, 5(3), 496-509.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.04.007

Fernández-d’Arlas, B. (2019). Tough and functional cross-linked bioplastics from sheep wool keratin. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 14810.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51393-5

Franck, R.R. (2001). Silk, Mohair, Cashmere and Other Luxury Fibres, 1st ed., Woodhead Publishing, England, 10-12p,

Giteru, S.G., Ramsey, D.H., Hou, Y., Cong, L., Mohan, A., & Bekhit, A.E.D.A. (2023). Wool keratin as a novel alternative protein: A comprehensive review of extraction, purification, nutrition, safety, and food applications. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 22(1), 643-687.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.13087

Gray, F.M., Smith, M.J., & Silva, M.B. (2011). Identification and characterization of textile fibers by thermal analysis. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(4), 476-479.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ed1004068

Heliopoulos, N.S., Komporozos, G.A., & Papageorgiou, S.K. (2024). Quality evaluation of wool: methods of evaluation of quality of wool, parameters, and important standards. In The Wool Handbook, 195-237p, Woodhead Publishing.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-99598-6.00013-X

Hearle, J.W., & Morton, W.E. (2008). Physical properties of textile fibres. 4st ed, Woodhead Publishing, England, 134-162p.

Kakkar, P., Verma, S., Manjubala, I., & Madhan, B. (2014). Development of keratin–chitosan–gelatin composite scaffold for soft tissue engineering. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 45, 343-347.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.09.021

Korjenic, A., Klarić, S., Hadžić, A., & Korjenic, S. (2015). Sheep wool as a construction material for energy efficiency improvement. Energies, 8(6), 5765-5781.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en8065765

Kozlowski, R.M., Muzyczek, M., & Walentowska, J. (2014). Flame retardancy and protection against biodeterioration of natural fibers: State-of-Art and Future Prospects. In Polymer Green Flame Retardants, 801-836p.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53808-6.00023-8

Li, W.R., Liu, C.X., Zhang, X.M., Chen, L., Peng, X.R., He, S.G., Lin, J.P., Han, B., Wang, L.Q., Huang, J.C. & Liu, M.J. (2017). CRISPR/Cas9‐mediated loss of FGF5 function increases wool staple length in sheep. The FEBS Journal, 284(17), 2764-2773.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.14144

Lyapina, M., Shkondrov, A., Vizeva, M., Alakidi, A., Nikolova, M., Krasteva, I., & Petkova, V. (2025). Lanolin as a contact sensitizer among cosmetology students and cosmeticians: A pilot study. Pharmacia, 72, 1-5.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/pharmacia.72.e151521

Mattiello, S., Guzzini, A., Del Giudice, A., Santulli, C., Antonini, M., Lupidi, G., & Gunnella, R. (2022). Physico-chemical characterization of keratin from wool and chicken feathers extracted using refined chemical methods. Polymers, 15(1), 181.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15010181

McGregor, B.A., Liu, X., & Wang, X.G. (2018). Comparisons of the Fourier Transform Infrared Spectra of cashmere, guard hair, wool and other animal fibres. The Journal of The Textile Institute, 109(6), 813-822.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2017.1372057

McLellan, J., Thornhill, S.G., Shelton, S., & Kumar, M. (2018). Keratin-based biofilms, hydrogels, and biofibers. In Keratin as a Protein Biopolymer: Extraction from Waste Biomass and Applications, 187-200p, Cham. Springer International Publishing.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02901-2_7

Mutlu, E., & Dinçel, D. (2024). Derleme: Koyunlarda yapağı özelliklerine etkili olan keratin ile ilişkili protein genleri. Kadirli Uygulamalı Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(1), 285-302.

Notayi, M., Hunter, L., Engelbrecht, J.A., Botha, A.F., Minnaar, E.G., Lee, M.E., & Erasmus, R. (2022). The application of Raman spectroscopic ratiometric analysis for distinguishing between wool and mohair. Journal of Natural Fibers, 19(15), 11536-11546.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2022.2028212

Odabaşioğlu, F., Küçük, M., & Yilmaz, O. (2009). Investigation of Mohair production, clean yield, and fibre characteristics in Coloured Mohair goat and F_1 cross-bred kids of Angora goat x Coloured Mohair goat. Turkish Journal of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, 33(1), 7-13.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3906/vet-0702-11

Saaidia, R., Othmane, A.B., Ayed, L., Boumediene, N., & Bouabidi, A. (2025). Thermal, Acoustic, and mechanical characterization of sheep Wool-Based Bio-Composites for sustainable construction. Energy and Buildings, 116602.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.116602

Sahin, O., Yagcioglu, K.D., Kadioglu, Y.K., Ozturk, H.S., & Gunes, A. (2025). Valorization of Sheep Wool: Impact of Keratin Hydrolysate on the Growth and Mineral Nutrition of Lettuce, Spinach, and Radish Plants. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 25(2), 2642-2652.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-025-02289-z

Sariçiçek, B.Z. (2021). The effect of rangeland quality on the mohair quality of Angora goats fed on the natural rangelands. Turkish Journal of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, 45(4), 678-690.

DOI: http://doi.org/10.3906/vet-2103-113

Sparrow, L.G, Dowling, L.M., Loke, V.Y., & Strike, P.M. (1989). Amino acid sequences of wool. The Biology of Wool and Hair, 1st ed., 145-155p, New York, USA.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9702-1

Stipo, G., Alecci, V., De Stefano, M., Galassi, S., Salvatici, M.C., & Satta, M.L. (2025). Mechanical performances of natural textiles for eco-friendly composite materials: A comparative assessment. Fibers, 13(11), 148.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/fib13110148

Vineis, C., Varesano, A., Varchi, G., & Aluigi, A. (2018). Extraction and characterization of keratin from different biomasses. In Keratin as a Protein Biopolymer: Extraction from Waste Biomass and Applications, Cham: Springer International Publishing, England, 35-76p.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02901-2_3

Wang, B., Yang, W., McKittrick, J., & Meyers, M.A. (2016). Keratin: Structure, mechanical properties, occurrence in biological organisms, and efforts at bioinspiration. Progress in Materials Science, 76, 229-318.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.06.001

Wang, J., Hao, S., Luo, T., Zhou, T., Yang, X., & Wang, B. (2017). Keratose/poly (vinyl alcohol) blended nanofibers: Fabrication and biocompatibility assessment. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 72, 212-219.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.11.071

Wang, Z., Zhang, H., Yang, H., Wang, S., Rong, E., Pei, W., Li, H., & Wang, N. (2014). Genome-wide association study for wool production traits in a Chinese Merino sheep population. PloS One, 9(9), e107101.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107101

Wortmann, F.J., & Deutz, H. (1993). Characterizing keratins using high‐pressure differential scanning calorimetry (HPDSC). Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 48(1), 137-150.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1993.070480114

Yaman, Y., Önaldi, A.T., Doğan, Ş., Kirbaş, M., Behrem, S., & Kal, Y. (2025). Exploring the polygenic landscape of wool traits in Turkish Merinos through multi-locus GWAS approaches: middle Anatolian Merino. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 10611.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-95099-3

Zoccola, M., Bhavsar, P., Anceschi, A., & Patrucco, A. (2023). Analytical methods for the identification and quantitative determination of wool and fine animal fibers: a review. Fibers, 11(8), 67.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/fib11080067

Zhang, C., Qin, Q., Wang, Y., Wang, Z., & Liu, Z. (2024). Identification of key proteins related to cashmere fiber diameter by integrated proteomics and bioinformatic analyses in the Alpas and Alxa goat breeds. Genes, 15(9), 1154.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15091154

Zhang, C., Wang, Y., Xing, A., Xu, B., Wang, M., Wang, Z., & Liu, Z. (2025). Integrating proteomics revealed the key targets for molecular breeding of fine cashmere traits in cashmere goats. Frontiers in Veterinary Science,12, 1696953.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1696953

Zhou, H., Bai, L., Li, S., Li, W., Wang, J., Tao, J., & Hickford, J.G. (2024). Genetics of wool and cashmere fibre: progress, challenges, and future research. Animals, 14(22), 3228.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14223228

Published

2025-12-25

How to Cite

Bozca, B., & Özdemir, A. (2025). Fiber Analysis Methods and Future Perspectives in Small Ruminant Farming. Veterinary and Zootechnical Sciences, 1(2), 250–262. https://doi.org/10.64614/vzs-29